![Scientific journal NRU ITMO
Series](/images/mag-ihbt.png)
The development of a competitive private sector as the direction of the state anti-corruption strategy
![Scientific journal NRU ITMO
Series](/images/mag-ihbt.png)
Annotation
The World’s experience in the fight against corruption demonstratesthat several foreign countries have been able to createsuch mechanisms which allowed limiting the extent of corruptionso that it stopped to be a serious threat to normal performanceof the state machine. The practice of those states, where structuralchanges have given the greatest results and thereby created theground for successful economic growth, is of primary concern.According to Corruption Perceptions Index research for recentyears, the least corrupt countries in the world are Denmark, NewZealand, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Switzerland, Singapore, theNetherlands, Luxembourg, Canada, etc. These countries haveachieved some success in the fight against corruption. The idea of identifying the anti-corruption programs that have proventheir practical efficiency presents a great potential for positiveborrowing of foreign experience. However, it would be usefulto refer as well to experience of the younger countries, whichalso passed the stages of socio-economic transformation, such asSouth Korea, Russia, Georgia etc. Besides that, anti-corruptionpolicy of the USA is also noteworthy. This research involves identifying the features of anti-corruption policies of foreign countries that enable them to successfully implement measures to combat corruption offenses, as well as clarify the ways in which certain experience of foreign legislation could borrow. It defines perspective ways of using foreign anti-corruption experience through establishment of a competitive private sector. The main factors that adversely affect the formation of bona fide competition in the private sector of the Republic of Kazakhstan, such as unreasonably high proportion of state involvement in the economy; the presence of "hidden monopolies"; high barriers to exit the market in monopolistic industries; administrative barriers; the absence of criminal liability of legal persons; underdevelopment of corporate management; passivity of business associations in the fight against corruption in the private sector. The authors have developed the recommendations, implementation of which is the destruction of naprvlena corruption networks, the development of bona fide competitive relations, increase transparency of corporate governance, enhance the fight against corruption on the part of the private sector, all of which will reduce the level of corruption risks. corruption risks.
Keywords
Постоянный URL
Articles in current issue
- Methodical approaches to economic modeling of the common minerals effective transport range
- Questions of economy, efficiency of public administration The nature and main key towards effective state investment policy
- Analysis of evolution of the concept «cluster». Approaches to classification
- Methods of creation and the analysis of the network schedule for assessment of innovative capacity of the enterprise on the basis of KPI
- Trading topos in the space of digit: the ultimate expression of globalization
- Organizational and legal peculiarities of regulation of the valuation of the property complex
- Regulatory, technical and organizational support of the technical university project management
- Analysis of existing methods to inform management decisions under conditions of risk and uncertainty
- The importance of quality management system in companies
- Waste management industry designing based on Technological Cycle of municipal solid waste
- Yamal LNG: new risks and opportunities of Russian energy sector in the Arctic
- The concepts of resource efficiency and corporate environmental responsibility: a brief overview of the ERREC intensive week in St. Petersburg
- The assessment of the efficiency of energy crops production as a biofuel sources